The average WOZ value in Kloppendijk is €450,000, 6% higher than in Dinkelland (€424,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 3%, the same as in Dinkelland. 76% of the homes are owner-occupied, 1 percentage point more than in Dinkelland (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€450,000
▲6% higher than Dinkelland (€424,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+3%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+3%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
76%
▲1 percentage point higher than Dinkelland (75%)
Social housing
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (12%)
Private rent
24%
▲11 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (13%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (85%)
Built 1945–1964
25%
▲12 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (13%)
Built 1992–2005
28%
▲11 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (17%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (8%)
Average WOZ value
€450,000
▲6% higher than Dinkelland (€424,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+3%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+3%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
76%
▲1 percentage point higher than Dinkelland (75%)
Social housing
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (12%)
Private rent
24%
▲11 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (13%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (85%)
Built 1945–1964
25%
▲12 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (13%)
Built 1992–2005
28%
▲11 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (17%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (8%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 3% between 2024 and 2025, to €450,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€450,000▲ 6% above Dinkelland
+3% since 2024
Dinkelland +3%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€479 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€479/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
259 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €450,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€126NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€35€40
Sewage levy€30€22
Waste levy€17€27
Costs to set aside€353
Maintenance reserve€330–
Buildings insurance€23–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Dinkelland's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 77th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 259 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €450,000.
Levies: Dinkelland's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Kloppendijk has the 4th-highest WOZ value of the 12 buurten in Denekamp.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €450,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Kloppendijk
450,000
37
–
Centrum
306,000
483
–
Kerkeres
334,000
552
–
Klokkenberg
433,000
131
–
Dorper-Es
400,000
139
–
Veldkamp en Borchert
348,000
851
–
Janskamp
349,000
866
–
Diepengoor
435,000
175
–
't Pierik
451,000
310
–
Remerink en Denekamp Oost
495,000
187
–
Sombeek
447,000
6
–
Buitengebied Denekamp
588,000
217
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 76% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied76%
Private rent24%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes92%
Multi-family homes8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
31% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 27% in the municipality of Dinkelland.
Before 19452.8%
1945-196425%
1965-197413.9%
1975-199130.6%
1992-200527.8%
Explanation
Based on 36 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Kloppendijk has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 5 crimes were registered, against 6 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 6 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 6 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
5 crimes were registered in Kloppendijk in 2025 (6 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
5
down from 6 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Kloppendijk is 'Traffic': 3 in 2025.
Traffic3
Theft and burglary1
Fraud and scams1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Kloppendijk registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2022
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Dinkelland average.
Built-up land is the largest land use in Kloppendijk, covering 96% of the area, against 4% in Dinkelland. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 4% of the area, 10 percentage points below the 14% in Dinkelland.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (14%)
Built-up, share of the area
96%
▲92 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (4%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼79 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (79%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
4%
▼8 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (12%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (14%)
Built-up, share of the area
96%
▲92 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (4%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼79 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (79%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
4%
▼8 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (12%)
Land use
4% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Dinkelland.
Built-up95.7%
Forest and nature4.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 1200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,300 m
–
GP practice
1,500 m
–
Primary school
1,300 m
–
Daycare
1,200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the Dinkelland average.
Kloppendijk has 75 inhabitants (2026), or 295 per km² (93% higher than in Dinkelland). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Dinkelland was 88%, 10 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
+0%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Dinkelland
88%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (27%)
Married
60%
▲16 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (44%)
Dutch origin
75%
▼15 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (90%)
CDA, share of the vote
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2024
+0%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Dinkelland
88%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (27%)
Married
60%
▲16 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (44%)
Dutch origin
75%
▼15 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (90%)
CDA, share of the vote
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2024 and 2026, at 75.
Residents, 2026
75
+0% since 2024
Dinkelland +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 295 residents per km², this buurt is 93% more densely populated than the municipality of Dinkelland.
Residents per km²295
Dwellings per km²148
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
38% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 155
15 to 2510
25 to 4515
45 to 6530
65 to 8010
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
60% of residents are married.
Never married25
Married45
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
75% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands60
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Dinkelland; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 88% of eligible voters in Dinkelland voted. The largest party was CDA with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of DinkellandThe Netherlands
D66
9.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.7%
16.7%
VVD
18.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
4.1%
12.8%
CDA
22.6%
11.8%
JA21
9.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.4%
4.5%
BBB
10.1%
2.6%
Other
4.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
55% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 32 percentage points more than in Dinkelland (23%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
33%
▲19 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (14%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (15%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
33%
▲14 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (19%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
55%
▲32 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+5 pp
▲higher than Dinkelland (+2 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
29%
▼59 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (88%)
Industrial, share of addresses
60%
▲57 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (3%)
Office, share of addresses
23%
▲22 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (1%)
Residents per km²
295
▼45% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
24%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
33%
▲19 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (14%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (15%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
33%
▲14 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (19%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
55%
▲32 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+5 pp
▲higher than Dinkelland (+2 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
29%
▼59 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (88%)
Industrial, share of addresses
60%
▲57 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (3%)
Office, share of addresses
23%
▲22 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (1%)
Residents per km²
295
▼45% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
24%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 25 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca25
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg0
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
55% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 23% in the municipality of Dinkelland (2025).
Petrol45.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)54.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 50% to 55% between 2024 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
55%▲ 32 percentage points above Dinkelland (23%)
+5 pp since 2024
Dinkelland +1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 595 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars595
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
29% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (60%).
Residential28.6%
Retail2.4%
Office23%
Assembly0.8%
Industrial60.3%
Other3.2%
Explanation
Based on 126 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
8% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings8%
NL 37%▼ −78% vs NL
Residents per km²295
NL 539▼ −45% vs NL
Private rent24%
NL 14%▲ +71% vs NL
Single-family dwellings92%
NL 63%▲ +46% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings76%
NL 57%▲ +33% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025