The population is growing slower than in Borne. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Borne, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Tichelkamp is €310,000, 22% lower than in Borne (€395,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 42%, against a rise of 41% in Borne. 84% of the homes are owner-occupied, 14 percentage points more than in Borne (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€310,000
▼22% lower than Borne (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+42%
=about the same as Borne (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲14 percentage points higher than Borne (70%)
Social housing
11%
▼11 percentage points lower than Borne (22%)
Private rent
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than Borne (8%)
Single-family dwellings
93%
▲9 percentage points higher than Borne (84%)
Built 2006–2015
2%
▼11 percentage points lower than Borne (13%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼8 percentage points lower than Borne (13%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼6 percentage points lower than Borne (7%)
Average WOZ value
€310,000
▼22% lower than Borne (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+42%
=about the same as Borne (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲14 percentage points higher than Borne (70%)
Social housing
11%
▼11 percentage points lower than Borne (22%)
Private rent
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than Borne (8%)
Single-family dwellings
93%
▲9 percentage points higher than Borne (84%)
Built 2006–2015
2%
▼11 percentage points lower than Borne (13%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼8 percentage points lower than Borne (13%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼6 percentage points lower than Borne (7%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 42% between 2021 and 2025, to €310,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€310,000▼ 22% below Borne
+42% since 2021
Borne +41%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€295 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€295/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
128 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €310,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€121NL median
Water board levy€40–
Property tax (OZB)€38€27
Waste levy€24€27
Sewage levy€19€22
Costs to set aside€174
Maintenance reserve€163–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Borne's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 206th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 128 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €310,000.
Levies: Borne's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Tichelkamp has the lowest WOZ value of the 10 buurten in Borne.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €310,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Tichelkamp
310,000
499
–
Bornsche Maten
536,000
1,585
–
Borne Centrum
330,000
1,910
–
't Wensink Noord
385,000
452
–
't Wensink Zuid
317,000
882
–
Dikkerslaan-Molenkampsweg en omgeving
386,000
764
–
Letterveld I
385,000
572
–
Letterveld II
338,000
1,283
–
Stroom-Esch
386,000
1,544
–
Verspreide huizen Borne-West
590,000
120
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 84% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied84%
Social housing11%
Private rent5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
93% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes93%
Multi-family homes7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
35% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 17% in the municipality of Borne.
Before 194516.4%
1945-19640.6%
1965-197434.6%
1975-199132.4%
1992-20058.8%
2006-20152.2%
2016 and later5%
Explanation
Based on 500 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Borne average.
In 2025, 13 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Tichelkamp, 48% lower than in Borne (25). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 43%, against no real change in Borne. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
13
▼48% lower than Borne (25)
Change since 2021
-43%
▼lower than Borne (-0%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.3
▼24% lower than Borne (1.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
13
▼48% lower than Borne (25)
Change since 2021
-43%
▼lower than Borne (-0%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.3
▼24% lower than Borne (1.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Tichelkamp registered 13 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 25 in the municipality of Borne.
Tichelkamp13
The municipality of Borne25
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Tichelkamp is 'Theft and burglary': 6.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 9.4 in the municipality of Borne.
TichelkampBorne
Theft and burglary6.1
Borne 9.4▼ −35% vs Borne
Fraud and scams2.6
Borne 3.9▼ −33% vs Borne
Other and withheld2.6
Borne 1.9▲ +37% vs Borne
Traffic1.7
Borne 3.8▼ −55% vs Borne
Vandalism and public order0.0
Borne 3.9▼ −100% vs Borne
Violence and threats0.0
Borne 2.4▼ −100% vs Borne
Environmental0.0
Borne 0.1≈ Borne
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Tichelkamp registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Borne average; green space is below the Borne average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Tichelkamp rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points less than in Borne. More adults are overweight (58% against 53%), more smoke (16% against 13%), more feel lonely (42% against 40%) and more meet the physical activity guideline (58% against 56%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Tichelkamp, covering 86% of the area, against 21% in Borne. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 6% of the area, 6 percentage points below the 12% in Borne.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than Borne (78%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Borne (12%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲5 percentage points higher than Borne (53%)
Smokes
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than Borne (13%)
Lonely
42%
▲2 percentage points higher than Borne (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
58%
▲2 percentage points higher than Borne (56%)
Built-up, share of the area
86%
▲65 percentage points higher than Borne (21%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼58 percentage points lower than Borne (58%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Borne (7%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than Borne (78%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Borne (12%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲5 percentage points higher than Borne (53%)
Smokes
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than Borne (13%)
Lonely
42%
▲2 percentage points higher than Borne (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
58%
▲2 percentage points higher than Borne (56%)
Built-up, share of the area
86%
▲65 percentage points higher than Borne (21%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼58 percentage points lower than Borne (58%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Borne (7%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 78% in the municipality of Borne (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Borne
Good self-rated health
76.3%
77.7%
Smokes
16.4%
13.4%
Excessive drinking
7.1%
7.1%
Overweight
58.1%
52.6%
Lonely
42.4%
40.1%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.4%
39.1%
Meets physical activity guideline
57.5%
55.6%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
6% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 12% in the municipality of Borne.
Traffic2.9%
Built-up85.7%
Other built-up5.7%
Recreation5.7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 800 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
900 m
–
GP practice
800 m
–
Primary school
900 m
–
Daycare
800 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1
GP practices
–
0.9
Daycares
–
1.3
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Borne average.
Tichelkamp has 1,175 inhabitants (2026), or 3,296 per km² (3.4 times as high as in Borne). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 3%, against a rise of 6% in Borne. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Borne was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+3%
▼lower than Borne (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Borne
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
=about the same as Borne (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲4 percentage points higher than Borne (25%)
Never married
45%
=about the same as Borne (45%)
Dutch origin
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Borne (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
55%
▲12 percentage points higher than Borne (43%)
CDA, share of the vote
19%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2021
+3%
▼lower than Borne (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Borne
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
=about the same as Borne (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲4 percentage points higher than Borne (25%)
Never married
45%
=about the same as Borne (45%)
Dutch origin
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Borne (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
55%
▲12 percentage points higher than Borne (43%)
CDA, share of the vote
19%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population grew 3% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,175.
Residents, 2026
1,175
+3% since 2021
Borne +6%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,296 residents per km², this buurt is 3.4 times as densely populated as the municipality of Borne.
Residents per km²3,296
Dwellings per km²1,386.1
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.7 children were born per 1,000 residents; 4.3 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15180
15 to 25140
25 to 45295
45 to 65345
65 to 80190
80 and over30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married530
Married530
Divorced75
Widowed35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
82% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands950
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)75
Outside Europe140
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
55% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1200
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4480
Higher professional, university190
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Borne; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Borne voted. The largest party was CDA with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BorneThe Netherlands
D66
16.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.9%
16.7%
VVD
17.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.9%
12.8%
CDA
18.7%
11.8%
JA21
7.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
3.4%
2.6%
Other
7.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Tichelkamp has an average of 1.3 cars per household, about the same as in Borne (1.3). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Borne (23%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Borne (14%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
24%
▲5 percentage points higher than Borne (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
14%
▼5 percentage points lower than Borne (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Borne (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼3 percentage points lower than Borne (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Borne (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Borne (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼1 percentage point lower than Borne (3%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Borne (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
7%
▼30 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
11%
▼17 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Borne (14%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
24%
▲5 percentage points higher than Borne (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
14%
▼5 percentage points lower than Borne (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Borne (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼3 percentage points lower than Borne (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Borne (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Borne (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼1 percentage point lower than Borne (3%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Borne (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
7%
▼30 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
11%
▼17 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 25 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie20
Handel en horeca25
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening25
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 23% in the municipality of Borne (2025).
Petrol79.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 20% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 3 percentage points below Borne (23%)
+6 pp since 2021
Borne +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 660 passenger cars and 85 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars660
Motorcycles85
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (2%).
Residential94.3%
Retail2.1%
Office0.6%
Assembly1.1%
Industrial2.1%
Sports0.2%
Other1.1%
Explanation
Based on 530 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3,296 residents per km²: 6.1 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²3,296
NL 539▲ +512% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings7%
NL 37%▼ −81% vs NL
Private rent5%
NL 14%▼ −64% vs NL
Social housing11%
NL 28%▼ −61% vs NL
Single-family dwellings93%
NL 63%▲ +48% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026