The average WOZ value in Hondelink is €506,000, 31% higher than in Berkelland (€385,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 34%, against a rise of 41% in Berkelland. 100% of the homes are owner-occupied, 31 percentage points more than in Berkelland (69%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€506,000
▲31% higher than Berkelland (€385,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+34%
▼lower than Berkelland (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
100%
▲31 percentage points higher than Berkelland (69%)
Social housing
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Berkelland (24%)
Private rent
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berkelland (8%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲17 percentage points higher than Berkelland (80%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼15 percentage points lower than Berkelland (22%)
Built 1965–1974
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Berkelland (20%)
Built before 1945
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berkelland (18%)
Average WOZ value
€506,000
▲31% higher than Berkelland (€385,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+34%
▼lower than Berkelland (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
100%
▲31 percentage points higher than Berkelland (69%)
Social housing
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Berkelland (24%)
Private rent
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berkelland (8%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲17 percentage points higher than Berkelland (80%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼15 percentage points lower than Berkelland (22%)
Built 1965–1974
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Berkelland (20%)
Built before 1945
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berkelland (18%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 34% between 2021 and 2025, to €506,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€506,000▲ 31% above Berkelland
+34% since 2021
Berkelland +41%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€393 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€393/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
184 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €506,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€141NL median
Water board levy€46–
Property tax (OZB)€42€44
Sewage levy€35€22
Waste levy€18€27
Costs to set aside€252
Maintenance reserve€235–
Buildings insurance€17–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Berkelland's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 169th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 184 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €506,000.
Levies: Berkelland's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Hondelink has the 4th-highest WOZ value of the 15 buurten in Neede.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €506,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Hondelink
506,000
60
–
Noordijk
398,000
95
–
Rietmolen
393,000
250
–
Verspreide huizen Rietmolen en Broeke
521,000
174
–
Verspreide huizen Noordijk
557,000
238
–
Verspreide huizen Neede
568,000
305
–
De Berg
314,000
573
–
Roodland
307,000
229
–
Ruwenhof-Meijersveld
297,000
788
–
Hofmaat
272,000
625
–
Neede Centrum
268,000
219
–
Julianastraat eo
306,000
368
–
De Kamp-Spilbroek
408,000
283
–
Moeshof eo
296,000
498
–
Industerrein Neede
453,000
105
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 100% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
97% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes97%
Multi-family homes3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
50% of dwellings were built in 2016 or later, against 4% in the municipality of Berkelland.
Before 194510%
1945-19645%
1965-19748.3%
1975-19916.7%
1992-200513.3%
2006-20156.7%
2016 and later50%
Explanation
Based on 60 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Hondelink has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 3 crimes were registered, against 0 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
3 crimes were registered in Hondelink in 2025 (0 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
3
up from 0 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Hondelink is 'Fraud and scams': 2 in 2025.
Fraud and scams2
Theft and burglary1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Hondelink registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Berkelland average; green space is above the Berkelland average.
An estimated 86% of adults in Hondelink rate their own health as good, 10 percentage points more than in Berkelland. Fewer adults feel lonely (31% against 40%), fewer are overweight (50% against 55%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (36% against 41%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (55% against 50%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Hondelink, covering 50% of the area, against 5% in Berkelland. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 50% of the area, 40 percentage points above the 10% in Berkelland.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
86%
▲10 percentage points higher than Berkelland (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
50%
▲40 percentage points higher than Berkelland (10%)
More figures
Lonely
31%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berkelland (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
55%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berkelland (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berkelland (41%)
Overweight
50%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berkelland (55%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼81 percentage points lower than Berkelland (81%)
Recreation, share of the area
50%
▲49 percentage points higher than Berkelland (1%)
Built-up, share of the area
50%
▲45 percentage points higher than Berkelland (5%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
86%
▲10 percentage points higher than Berkelland (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
50%
▲40 percentage points higher than Berkelland (10%)
More figures
Lonely
31%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berkelland (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
55%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berkelland (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berkelland (41%)
Overweight
50%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berkelland (55%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼81 percentage points lower than Berkelland (81%)
Recreation, share of the area
50%
▲49 percentage points higher than Berkelland (1%)
Built-up, share of the area
50%
▲45 percentage points higher than Berkelland (5%)
Health
An estimated 86% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Berkelland (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Berkelland
Good self-rated health
85.7%
76.1%
Smokes
10.4%
14.1%
Excessive drinking
7.3%
7.5%
Overweight
50.5%
55.4%
Lonely
30.9%
40.4%
Anxiety or depression feelings
35.7%
41.1%
Meets physical activity guideline
55.1%
49.6%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
50% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Berkelland.
Built-up50%
Recreation50%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,000 m
–
GP practice
1,200 m
–
Primary school
200 m
–
Daycare
2,100 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.8
GP practices
–
0.1
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Berkelland average.
Hondelink has 155 inhabitants (2026), or 1,350 per km² (7.9 times as high as in Berkelland). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Berkelland was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 16% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Berkelland (+0%)
Turnout, municipality of Berkelland
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+43%
▲higher than Berkelland (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
=about the same as Berkelland (29%)
Married
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berkelland (45%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berkelland (90%)
CDA, share of the vote
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Berkelland (+0%)
Turnout, municipality of Berkelland
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+43%
▲higher than Berkelland (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
=about the same as Berkelland (29%)
Married
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berkelland (45%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berkelland (90%)
CDA, share of the vote
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population grew 41% between 2021 and 2026, to 155.
Residents, 2026
155
+41% since 2021
Berkelland +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 1,350 residents per km², this buurt is 7.9 times as densely populated as the municipality of Berkelland.
Residents per km²1,350
Dwellings per km²500
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1530
15 to 2515
25 to 4540
45 to 6545
65 to 8025
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are married.
Never married70
Married75
Divorced10
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
97% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands155
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Berkelland; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Berkelland voted. The largest party was CDA with 16% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BerkellandThe Netherlands
D66
13.2%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.6%
16.7%
VVD
15.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
9.3%
12.8%
CDA
15.9%
11.8%
JA21
6.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.4%
4.5%
BBB
10%
2.6%
Other
7.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Hondelink has an average of 2.3 cars per household, 64% higher than in Berkelland (1.4). 23% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points more than in Berkelland (20%).
Key figures
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
20%
▲15 percentage points higher than Berkelland (5%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Berkelland (15%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berkelland (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
2.3
▲64% higher than Berkelland (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berkelland (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+13 pp
▲higher than Berkelland (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲8 percentage points higher than Berkelland (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berkelland (7%)
Sports, share of addresses
3%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berkelland (0%)
Residents per km²
1,350
▲2.5 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
100%
▲43 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
20%
▲15 percentage points higher than Berkelland (5%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Berkelland (15%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berkelland (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
2.3
▲64% higher than Berkelland (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berkelland (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+13 pp
▲higher than Berkelland (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲8 percentage points higher than Berkelland (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berkelland (7%)
Sports, share of addresses
3%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berkelland (0%)
Residents per km²
1,350
▲2.5 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
100%
▲43 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 5 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
23% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Berkelland (2025).
Petrol76.9%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)23.1%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 10% to 23% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
23%▲ 3 percentage points above Berkelland (20%)
+13 pp since 2021
Berkelland +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 130 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars130
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
95% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is sport (3%).
Residential95.2%
Retail1.6%
Assembly1.6%
Industrial1.6%
Lodging1.6%
Education1.6%
Sports3.2%
Explanation
Based on 63 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings3%
NL 37%▼ −92% vs NL
Residents per km²1,350
NL 539▲ +151% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings100%
NL 57%▲ +75% vs NL
Single-family dwellings97%
NL 63%▲ +54% vs NL
Average WOZ value€506,000
NL €398,000▲ +27% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025