The population is shrinking slower than in Bergen (L.). Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Bergen (L.), and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Aijen is €468,000, 31% higher than in Bergen (L.) (€358,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 121%, against a rise of 72% in Bergen (L.). 96% of the homes are owner-occupied, 25 percentage points more than in Bergen (L.) (71%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€468,000
▲31% higher than Bergen (L.) (€358,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+121%
▲higher than Bergen (L.) (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲25 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (71%)
Social housing
0%
▼23 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (23%)
Private rent
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (6%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (93%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼16 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (25%)
Built 2006–2015
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (6%)
Built 2016 and later
7%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (5%)
Average WOZ value
€468,000
▲31% higher than Bergen (L.) (€358,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+121%
▲higher than Bergen (L.) (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲25 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (71%)
Social housing
0%
▼23 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (23%)
Private rent
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (6%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (93%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼16 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (25%)
Built 2006–2015
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (6%)
Built 2016 and later
7%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (5%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 121% between 2014 and 2025, to €468,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€468,000▲ 31% above Bergen (L.)
+121% since 2014
Bergen (L.) +72%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€347 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€347/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
159 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €468,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€130NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€32€41
Sewage levy€27€22
Waste levy€26€27
Costs to set aside€217
Maintenance reserve€203–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Bergen (L.)'s OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 92nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 159 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €468,000.
Levies: Bergen (L.)'s own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Aijen has the highest WOZ value of the 7 wijken in the municipality of Bergen (L.).
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €468,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Aijen
468,000
107
–
Oud-Bergen
382,000
157
–
Nieuw-Bergen
328,000
2,194
–
Afferden
372,000
939
–
Siebengewald
359,000
912
–
Well
378,000
1,053
–
Wellerlooi
386,000
525
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 96% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied96%
Private rent4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
95% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes95%
Multi-family homes5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
29% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 11% in the municipality of Bergen (L.).
Before 194529%
1945-196419.6%
1965-197420.6%
1975-19919.3%
1992-200513.1%
2006-20150.9%
2016 and later7.5%
Explanation
Based on 107 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Bergen (L.) average.
In 2025, 15 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Aijen, 50% lower than in Bergen (L.) (30). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 20%, against a fall of 22% in Bergen (L.). Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼50% lower than Bergen (L.) (30)
Change since 2021
-20%
▲higher than Bergen (L.) (-22%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼50% lower than Bergen (L.) (30)
Change since 2021
-20%
▲higher than Bergen (L.) (-22%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Aijen registered 15 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 30 in the municipality of Bergen (L.).
Aijen15
The municipality of Bergen (L.)30
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Aijen is 'Fraud and scams': 7.7 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.5 in the municipality of Bergen (L.).
AijenBergen (L.)
Fraud and scams7.7
Bergen (L.) 4.5▲ +71% vs Bergen (L.)
Traffic7.7
Bergen (L.) 4.3▲ +79% vs Bergen (L.)
Theft and burglary0.0
Bergen (L.) 12.4▼ −100% vs Bergen (L.)
Vandalism and public order0.0
Bergen (L.) 3.4▼ −100% vs Bergen (L.)
Violence and threats0.0
Bergen (L.) 4.0▼ −100% vs Bergen (L.)
Environmental0.0
Bergen (L.) 0.2≈ Bergen (L.)
Other and withheld0.0
Bergen (L.) 1.1▼ −100% vs Bergen (L.)
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
Residents rate their health above the Bergen (L.) average; green space is below the Bergen (L.) average.
An estimated 75% of adults in Aijen rate their own health as good, 4 percentage points more than in Bergen (L.). Fewer adults are overweight (52% against 58%), fewer feel lonely (38% against 43%), fewer report anxiety or depression (38% against 43%) and fewer smoke (12% against 15%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Aijen, covering 83% of the area, against 48% in Bergen (L.). Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 5% of the area, 36 percentage points below the 41% in Bergen (L.).
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (71%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▼36 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (41%)
More figures
Overweight
52%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (58%)
Lonely
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (43%)
Smokes
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (15%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲35 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
5%
▼33 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (38%)
Recreation, share of the area
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (71%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▼36 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (41%)
More figures
Overweight
52%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (58%)
Lonely
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (43%)
Smokes
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (15%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲35 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
5%
▼33 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (38%)
Recreation, share of the area
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (3%)
Health
An estimated 75% of adults rate their own health as good, against 71% in the municipality of Bergen (L.) (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Bergen (L.)
Good self-rated health
75.2%
71.3%
Smokes
11.9%
15%
Excessive drinking
5.9%
5.9%
Overweight
52.5%
58.5%
Lonely
37.5%
43.4%
Anxiety or depression feelings
37.9%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
48.8%
46.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
5% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 41% in the municipality of Bergen (L.).
Traffic2.7%
Built-up3.8%
Agriculture83.3%
Forest and nature5.3%
Water4.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking slower than the Bergen (L.) average.
Aijen has 255 inhabitants (2026), or 103 per km² (19% lower than in Bergen (L.)). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 88%, against a fall of 1% in Bergen (L.). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Bergen (L.) was 79%, 1 percentage point above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 29% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-88%
▼lower than Bergen (L.) (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergen (L.)
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-88%
▼lower than Bergen (L.) (+6%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (30%)
Married
52%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (45%)
Dutch origin
83%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergen (L.) (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
100%
▲50 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (50%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-88%
▼lower than Bergen (L.) (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergen (L.)
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-88%
▼lower than Bergen (L.) (+6%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (30%)
Married
52%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (45%)
Dutch origin
83%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergen (L.) (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
100%
▲50 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (50%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 88% between 2014 and 2026, to 255.
Residents, 2026
255
-88% since 2014
Bergen (L.) -1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 103 residents per km², this wijk is 19% less densely populated than the municipality of Bergen (L.).
Residents per km²103
Dwellings per km²42.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 19.2 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1525
15 to 2535
25 to 4545
45 to 6585
65 to 8050
80 and over15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
52% of residents are married.
Never married100
Married130
Divorced10
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
83% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands220
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)20
Outside Europe25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
100% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4100
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Bergen (L.); there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 79% of eligible voters in Bergen (L.) voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 29% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Bergen (L.)The Netherlands
D66
10.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
28.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.6%
12.8%
CDA
14.3%
11.8%
JA21
7.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.7%
4.5%
BBB
4.9%
2.6%
Other
6.1%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Aijen has an average of 1.8 cars per household, 29% higher than in Bergen (L.) (1.4). 30% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 9 percentage points more than in Bergen (L.) (21%).
Key figures
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (5%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (4%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
22%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (18%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.8
▲29% higher than Bergen (L.) (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
30%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+9 pp
▲higher than Bergen (L.) (−1 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
8%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (5%)
Assembly, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
5%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (3%)
Residents per km²
103
▼81% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲39 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (5%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Bergen (L.) (4%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
22%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (18%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.8
▲29% higher than Bergen (L.) (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
30%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+9 pp
▲higher than Bergen (L.) (−1 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
8%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (5%)
Assembly, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
5%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergen (L.) (3%)
Residents per km²
103
▼81% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲39 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie10
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
30% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Bergen (L.) (2025).
Petrol70.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)29.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 21% to 30% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
30%▲ 9 percentage points above Bergen (L.) (21%)
+9 pp since 2014
Bergen (L.) -2 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 185 passenger cars and 25 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars185
Motorcycles25
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (8%).
Residential91.5%
Assembly3.4%
Industrial7.7%
Lodging5.1%
Other2.6%
Explanation
Based on 117 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings5%
NL 37%▼ −86% vs NL
Residents per km²103
NL 539▼ −81% vs NL
Private rent4%
NL 14%▼ −71% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings96%
NL 57%▲ +68% vs NL
Single-family dwellings95%
NL 63%▲ +51% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025