The average WOZ value in Dorpsplein e.o. is €532,000, 12% higher than in Bergeijk (€477,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 39%, against a rise of 38% in Bergeijk. 60% of the homes are owner-occupied, 18 percentage points less than in Bergeijk (78%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€532,000
▲12% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+39%
▲higher than Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼18 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
24%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲14 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (86%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼21 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (25%)
Built 1992–2005
28%
▲17 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Built 1945–1964
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (15%)
Average WOZ value
€532,000
▲12% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+39%
▲higher than Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼18 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
24%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲14 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (86%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼21 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (25%)
Built 1992–2005
28%
▲17 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Built 1945–1964
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 39% between 2021 and 2025, to €532,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€532,000▲ 12% above Bergeijk
+39% since 2021
Bergeijk +38%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€382 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€382/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
188 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €532,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€125NL median
Water board levy€47–
Property tax (OZB)€33€47
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€22€22
Costs to set aside€257
Maintenance reserve€240–
Buildings insurance€17–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Bergeijk's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 15th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 188 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €532,000.
Levies: Bergeijk's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Dorpsplein e.o. has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 6 buurten in Riethoven.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €532,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Dorpsplein e.o.
532,000
25
–
Eviestraat-Vlasstraat e.o.
441,000
210
–
Willibrordusstraat e.o.
491,000
87
–
Dorpsstraat e.o.
565,000
170
–
De Hasselt e.o.
532,000
147
–
Walik
808,000
172
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 60% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied60%
Social housing16%
Private rent24%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
56% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 20% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
1945-196412%
1965-197456%
1975-19914%
1992-200528%
Explanation
Based on 25 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Dorpsplein e.o. has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 5 crimes were registered, against 4 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▲up from 4 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▲up from 4 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
5 crimes were registered in Dorpsplein e.o. in 2025 (4 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
5
up from 4 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Dorpsplein e.o. is 'Theft and burglary': 2 in 2025.
Theft and burglary2
Violence and threats2
Vandalism and public order1
Fraud and scams0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Dorpsplein e.o. registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Bergeijk average.
Built-up land is the largest land use in Dorpsplein e.o., covering 100% of the area, against 7% in Bergeijk.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲93 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲93 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 31% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Built-up100%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
4,100 m
–
GP practice
200 m
–
Primary school
300 m
–
Daycare
200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
1
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Bergeijk.
Dorpsplein e.o. has 50 inhabitants (2026), or 1,371 per km² (7.1 times as high as in Bergeijk). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Bergeijk was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (28%)
Married
56%
▲11 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (45%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (28%)
Married
56%
▲11 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (45%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 9% between 2021 and 2026, to 50.
Residents, 2026
50
-9% since 2021
Bergeijk +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 1,371 residents per km², this buurt is 7.1 times as densely populated as the municipality of Bergeijk.
Residents per km²1,371
Dwellings per km²625
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 45 and 65.
15 to 2510
25 to 455
45 to 6515
65 to 8015
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
56% of residents are married.
Never married15
Married25
Divorced5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
100% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands45
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Bergeijk; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Bergeijk voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BergeijkThe Netherlands
D66
12.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19%
16.7%
VVD
18.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.8%
12.8%
CDA
18.3%
11.8%
JA21
8.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
5%
2.6%
Other
6.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
0% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 21 percentage points less than in Bergeijk (21%).
Key figures
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
36%
▲24 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (12%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼11 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (20%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (10%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Assembly, share of addresses
10%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Office, share of addresses
7%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
3%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
24%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
36%
▲24 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (12%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼11 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (20%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (10%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Assembly, share of addresses
10%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Office, share of addresses
7%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
3%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
24%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed is the largest sector, with 20 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie10
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed20
Zakelijke dienstverlening15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2017
Passenger cars by fuel type
0% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2025).
Petrol100%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 0% to 0% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
0%▼ 21 percentage points below Bergeijk (21%)
+0 pp since 2021
Bergeijk +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 15 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars15
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
86% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is assembly (10%).
Residential86.2%
Retail3.4%
Office6.9%
Assembly10.3%
Lodging3.4%
Explanation
Based on 29 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
1,371 residents per km²: 2.5 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²1,371
NL 539▲ +154% vs NL
Social housing16%
NL 28%▼ −43% vs NL
Private rent24%
NL 14%▲ +71% vs NL
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Average WOZ value€532,000
NL €398,000▲ +34% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026