The population is shrinking about as fast as in Beesel. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Beesel, and registered crime per resident is about the same.
The average WOZ value in Reuver is €310,000, 4% lower than in Beesel (€324,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 78%, against a rise of 74% in Beesel. 64% of the homes are owner-occupied, 3 percentage points less than in Beesel (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€310,000
▼4% lower than Beesel (€324,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+78%
▲higher than Beesel (+74%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
64%
▼3 percentage points lower than Beesel (67%)
Social housing
31%
▲3 percentage points higher than Beesel (28%)
Private rent
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (6%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beesel (84%)
Built before 1945
9%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (10%)
Built 2006–2015
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (6%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
=about the same as Beesel (14%)
Average WOZ value
€310,000
▼4% lower than Beesel (€324,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+78%
▲higher than Beesel (+74%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
64%
▼3 percentage points lower than Beesel (67%)
Social housing
31%
▲3 percentage points higher than Beesel (28%)
Private rent
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (6%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beesel (84%)
Built before 1945
9%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (10%)
Built 2006–2015
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (6%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
=about the same as Beesel (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 78% between 2014 and 2025, to €310,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€310,000▼ 4% below Beesel
+78% since 2014
Beesel +74%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€312 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€312/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
141 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €310,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€119NL median
Water board levy€40–
Property tax (OZB)€40€27
Waste levy€21€27
Sewage levy€18€22
Costs to set aside€193
Maintenance reserve€180–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Beesel's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 185th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 141 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €310,000.
Levies: Beesel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Reuver has the lowest WOZ value of the 2 wijken in the municipality of Beesel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €310,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Reuver
310,000
5,105
–
Beesel
390,000
1,113
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 64% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied64%
Social housing31%
Private rent5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
82% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes82%
Multi-family homes18%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
30% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 29% in the municipality of Beesel.
Before 19458.9%
1945-196418.4%
1965-197416%
1975-199129.9%
1992-200513.7%
2006-20156.7%
2016 and later6.4%
Explanation
Based on 5,157 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
About as much registered crime per resident as the Beesel average.
In 2025, 26 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Reuver, about the same as in Beesel (26). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 18%, against a fall of 13% in Beesel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
26
=about the same as Beesel (26)
Change since 2021
-18%
▼lower than Beesel (-13%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.1
▼15% lower than Beesel (1.3)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
26
=about the same as Beesel (26)
Change since 2021
-18%
▼lower than Beesel (-13%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.1
▼15% lower than Beesel (1.3)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Reuver registered 26 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 26 in the municipality of Beesel.
Reuver26
The municipality of Beesel26
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Reuver is 'Theft and burglary': 8.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 7.2 in the municipality of Beesel.
ReuverBeesel
Theft and burglary8.0
Beesel 7.2▲ +11% vs Beesel
Traffic5.3
Beesel 5.7▼ −7% vs Beesel
Fraud and scams4.8
Beesel 4.7≈ Beesel
Violence and threats3.4
Beesel 3.3≈ Beesel
Vandalism and public order2.6
Beesel 3.0▼ −13% vs Beesel
Other and withheld1.9
Beesel 1.6▲ +19% vs Beesel
Environmental0.1
Beesel 0.1≈ Beesel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Reuver registered 41 traffic accidents, of which 5 with injury and 1 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Beesel average; green space is below the Beesel average.
An estimated 69% of adults in Reuver rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point less than in Beesel. More adults smoke (16% against 15%), more are overweight (57% against 56%), more feel lonely (46% against 45%) and more report anxiety or depression (45% against 44%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Reuver, covering 60% of the area, against 61% in Beesel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 13% of the area, 5 percentage points below the 18% in Beesel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
69%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (70%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
13%
▼5 percentage points lower than Beesel (18%)
More figures
Lonely
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (45%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (44%)
Overweight
57%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (56%)
Smokes
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (15%)
Built-up, share of the area
19%
▲7 percentage points higher than Beesel (12%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
8%
▼7 percentage points lower than Beesel (15%)
Recreation, share of the area
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (4%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
69%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (70%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
13%
▼5 percentage points lower than Beesel (18%)
More figures
Lonely
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (45%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (44%)
Overweight
57%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (56%)
Smokes
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (15%)
Built-up, share of the area
19%
▲7 percentage points higher than Beesel (12%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
8%
▼7 percentage points lower than Beesel (15%)
Recreation, share of the area
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (4%)
Health
An estimated 69% of adults rate their own health as good, against 70% in the municipality of Beesel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Beesel
Good self-rated health
69.2%
70.2%
Smokes
15.7%
15%
Excessive drinking
5%
5%
Overweight
57%
56.3%
Lonely
46.3%
45.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.3%
44.3%
Meets physical activity guideline
45.3%
45.8%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
13% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Beesel.
Traffic3.4%
Built-up18.7%
Other built-up1.1%
Recreation5%
Agriculture59.8%
Forest and nature8%
Water3.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking about as fast as the Beesel average.
Reuver has 11,130 inhabitants (2026), or 789 per km² (61% higher than in Beesel). Between 2014 and 2026 the population stayed about level, the same as in Beesel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Beesel was 76%, 2 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 29% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-0%
=about the same as Beesel (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Beesel
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+6%
=about the same as Beesel (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
=about the same as Beesel (27%)
Married
44%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (45%)
Dutch origin
78%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beesel (80%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
45%
=about the same as Beesel (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-0%
=about the same as Beesel (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Beesel
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+6%
=about the same as Beesel (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
=about the same as Beesel (27%)
Married
44%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (45%)
Dutch origin
78%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beesel (80%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
45%
=about the same as Beesel (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 11,130.
Residents, 2026
11,130
+0% since 2014
Beesel +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 789 residents per km², this wijk is 61% more densely populated than the municipality of Beesel.
Residents per km²789
Dwellings per km²361.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 9.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 11.7 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 151,535
15 to 251,130
25 to 452,545
45 to 652,980
65 to 802,255
80 and over680
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married4,655
Married4,940
Divorced850
Widowed685
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
78% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands8,705
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)1,285
Outside Europe1,140
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
44% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo12,940
Havo, vwo, mbo2-43,690
Higher professional, university1,660
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Beesel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 76% of eligible voters in Beesel voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 29% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BeeselThe Netherlands
D66
12.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
29%
16.7%
VVD
13.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.1%
12.8%
CDA
14.8%
11.8%
JA21
7.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.6%
2.6%
Other
7.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Reuver has an average of 1.2 cars per household, about the same as in Beesel (1.2). 19% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Beesel (19%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
22%
▲2 percentage points higher than Beesel (20%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (20%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (4%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Beesel (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
=about the same as Beesel (19%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+6 pp
=about the same as Beesel (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beesel (84%)
Lodging, share of addresses
8%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (7%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (3%)
Multi-family dwellings
18%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Residents per km²
789
▲46% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
22%
▲2 percentage points higher than Beesel (20%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (20%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (4%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Beesel (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
=about the same as Beesel (19%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+6 pp
=about the same as Beesel (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beesel (84%)
Lodging, share of addresses
8%
▲1 percentage point higher than Beesel (7%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼1 percentage point lower than Beesel (3%)
Multi-family dwellings
18%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Residents per km²
789
▲46% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 215 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij25
Nijverheid en energie150
Handel en horeca215
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie65
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed40
Zakelijke dienstverlening185
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg175
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten120
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
19% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 19% in the municipality of Beesel (2025).
Petrol81.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)18.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 13% to 19% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
19%– about the same as Beesel (19%)
+6 pp since 2014
Beesel +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 5,985 passenger cars and 470 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars5,985
Motorcycles470
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
82% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (8%).
Residential82.5%
Retail1.2%
Office0.7%
Assembly1.1%
Healthcare0.4%
Industrial2.5%
Lodging8.2%
Education0.1%
Sports0.1%
Other4.3%
Explanation
Based on 6,253 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5% private rent, against 14% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Private rent5%
NL 14%▼ −64% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings18%
NL 37%▼ −51% vs NL
Residents per km²789
NL 539▲ +46% vs NL
Single-family dwellings82%
NL 63%▲ +30% vs NL
Average WOZ value€310,000
NL €398,000▼ −22% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025