The average WOZ value in Kelmond is €501,000, 57% higher than in Beek (L.) (€319,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 27%, against a rise of 34% in Beek (L.). 98% of the homes are owner-occupied, 28 percentage points more than in Beek (L.) (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€501,000
▲57% higher than Beek (L.) (€319,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+27%
▼lower than Beek (L.) (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
98%
▲28 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (21%)
Private rent
2%
▼7 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (9%)
Single-family dwellings
90%
▲15 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (75%)
Built 1945–1964
13%
▼11 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (24%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (21%)
Built 1965–1974
17%
▼7 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (24%)
Average WOZ value
€501,000
▲57% higher than Beek (L.) (€319,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+27%
▼lower than Beek (L.) (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
98%
▲28 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (21%)
Private rent
2%
▼7 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (9%)
Single-family dwellings
90%
▲15 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (75%)
Built 1945–1964
13%
▼11 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (24%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (21%)
Built 1965–1974
17%
▼7 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (24%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 27% between 2021 and 2025, to €501,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€501,000▲ 57% above Beek (L.)
+27% since 2021
Beek (L.) +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€554 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€554/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
298 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €501,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€147NL median
Property tax (OZB)€50€44
Water board levy€46–
Waste levy€28€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€407
Maintenance reserve€380–
Buildings insurance€27–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Beek (L.)'s OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 241st of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 298 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €501,000.
Levies: Beek (L.)'s own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Kelmond has the highest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Beek-Zuid.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €501,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Kelmond
501,000
61
–
Geverik
392,000
172
–
Grootgenhout
373,000
414
–
Kleingenhout
397,000
68
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 98% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied98%
Private rent2%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
90% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes90%
Multi-family homes10%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
55% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 16% in the municipality of Beek (L.).
Before 194555%
1945-196413.3%
1965-197416.7%
1975-199111.7%
2016 and later3.3%
Explanation
Based on 60 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Kelmond has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 4 crimes were registered, against 1 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
4
▲up from 1 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
4
▲up from 1 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
4 crimes were registered in Kelmond in 2025 (1 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
4
up from 1 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Kelmond is 'Fraud and scams': 2 in 2025.
Fraud and scams2
Theft and burglary1
Traffic1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Kelmond registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Beek (L.) average; green space is below the Beek (L.) average.
An estimated 77% of adults in Kelmond rate their own health as good, 7 percentage points more than in Beek (L.). Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (38% against 46%), fewer are overweight (51% against 55%) and fewer feel lonely (44% against 48%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (50% against 43%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Kelmond, covering 91% of the area, against 59% in Beek (L.). Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 5% of the area, 2 percentage points below the 7% in Beek (L.).
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲7 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (70%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (7%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼8 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (46%)
Meets physical activity guideline
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (43%)
Overweight
51%
▼4 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (55%)
Lonely
44%
▼4 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (48%)
Agriculture, share of the area
91%
▲32 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (59%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼22 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (23%)
Traffic, share of the area
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲7 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (70%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▼2 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (7%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼8 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (46%)
Meets physical activity guideline
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (43%)
Overweight
51%
▼4 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (55%)
Lonely
44%
▼4 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (48%)
Agriculture, share of the area
91%
▲32 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (59%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼22 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (23%)
Traffic, share of the area
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (8%)
Health
An estimated 77% of adults rate their own health as good, against 70% in the municipality of Beek (L.) (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Beek (L.)
Good self-rated health
77.1%
69.5%
Smokes
12.6%
14.6%
Excessive drinking
7.7%
5%
Overweight
50.7%
54.7%
Lonely
44.5%
48%
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
45.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
50.5%
43.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
5% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 7% in the municipality of Beek (L.).
Traffic2.5%
Built-up1.3%
Recreation5.1%
Agriculture91.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,300 m
–
GP practice
2,700 m
–
Primary school
1,800 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.8
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Beek (L.).
Kelmond has 140 inhabitants (2026), or 173 per km² (77% lower than in Beek (L.)). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Beek (L.) was 79%, 1 percentage point above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 25% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Beek (L.) (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Beek (L.)
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Beek (L.) (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
39%
▲12 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (27%)
Married
54%
▲10 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (44%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲9 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (80%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
56%
▲29 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (27%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Beek (L.) (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Beek (L.)
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Beek (L.) (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
39%
▲12 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (27%)
Married
54%
▲10 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (44%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲9 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (80%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
56%
▲29 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (27%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 3% between 2021 and 2026, to 140.
Residents, 2026
140
-3% since 2021
Beek (L.) +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 173 residents per km², this buurt is 77% less densely populated than the municipality of Beek (L.).
Residents per km²173
Dwellings per km²76.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
39% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1510
15 to 2515
25 to 4515
45 to 6555
65 to 8040
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
54% of residents are married.
Never married45
Married75
Divorced15
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
89% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands120
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
56% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo150
Havo, vwo, mbo2-440
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Beek (L.); there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 79% of eligible voters in Beek (L.) voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 25% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Beek (L.)The Netherlands
D66
15.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
24.5%
16.7%
VVD
15.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
16.3%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
1.9%
2.6%
Other
7.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Kelmond has an average of 1.6 cars per household, 23% higher than in Beek (L.) (1.3). 29% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 11 percentage points more than in Beek (L.) (18%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
20%
▲18 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (2%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
0%
▼11 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (11%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (9%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲23% higher than Beek (L.) (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲11 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (18%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+10 pp
▲higher than Beek (L.) (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
80%
▼5 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (85%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
▲4 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (3%)
Assembly, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
10%
▼27 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Residents per km²
173
▼68% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
98%
▲41 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
20%
▲18 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (2%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
0%
▼11 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (11%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (9%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲23% higher than Beek (L.) (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲11 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (18%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+10 pp
▲higher than Beek (L.) (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
80%
▼5 percentage points lower than Beek (L.) (85%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
▲4 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (3%)
Assembly, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Beek (L.) (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
10%
▼27 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Residents per km²
173
▼68% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
98%
▲41 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 5 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie0
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
29% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 18% in the municipality of Beek (L.) (2025).
Petrol71.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)28.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 19% to 29% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
29%▲ 11 percentage points above Beek (L.) (18%)
+10 pp since 2021
Beek (L.) +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 105 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars105
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
80% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (7%).
Residential80%
Retail1.3%
Office2.7%
Assembly4%
Industrial6.7%
Lodging2.7%
Other5.3%
Explanation
Based on 75 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2% private rent, against 14% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Private rent2%
NL 14%▼ −86% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings10%
NL 37%▼ −73% vs NL
Residents per km²173
NL 539▼ −68% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings98%
NL 57%▲ +72% vs NL
Single-family dwellings90%
NL 63%▲ +43% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025