The average WOZ value in Matenhoek is €429,000, 11% higher than in Apeldoorn (€386,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 25%, against a rise of 39% in Apeldoorn. 79% of the homes are owner-occupied, 19 percentage points more than in Apeldoorn (60%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€429,000
▲11% higher than Apeldoorn (€386,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+25%
▼lower than Apeldoorn (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲19 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (60%)
Social housing
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (28%)
Private rent
21%
▲9 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (12%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲15 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (70%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼14 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (18%)
Built 1992–2005
23%
▲10 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (13%)
Built before 1945
25%
▲9 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (16%)
Average WOZ value
€429,000
▲11% higher than Apeldoorn (€386,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+25%
▼lower than Apeldoorn (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲19 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (60%)
Social housing
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (28%)
Private rent
21%
▲9 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (12%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲15 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (70%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼14 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (18%)
Built 1992–2005
23%
▲10 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (13%)
Built before 1945
25%
▲9 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (16%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 25% between 2021 and 2025, to €429,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€429,000▲ 11% above Apeldoorn
+25% since 2021
Apeldoorn +39%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€407 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€407/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
207 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €429,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€124NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€38€38
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€15€22
Costs to set aside€283
Maintenance reserve€264–
Buildings insurance€19–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Apeldoorn's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 80th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 207 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €429,000.
Levies: Apeldoorn's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Matenhoek has the highest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Zuidoost.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €429,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Matenhoek
429,000
47
–
Matendreef
282,000
1,945
–
Matenhorst
281,000
1,338
–
Matendonk
300,000
2,244
–
Matenhoeve
336,000
1,916
–
Matenveld
321,000
2,378
–
Matengaarde
290,000
1,523
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 79% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied79%
Private rent21%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
85% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes85%
Multi-family homes15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
40% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 24% in the municipality of Apeldoorn.
Before 194525%
1945-19646.2%
1965-19744.2%
1975-199139.6%
1992-200522.9%
2006-20152.1%
Explanation
Based on 48 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Matenhoek has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 25 crimes were registered, against 17 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
25
▲up from 17 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
25
▲up from 17 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
25 crimes were registered in Matenhoek in 2025 (17 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
25
up from 17 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Matenhoek is 'Traffic': 12 in 2025.
Traffic12
Theft and burglary5
Vandalism and public order4
Violence and threats4
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Matenhoek registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Apeldoorn average; green space is below the Apeldoorn average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Matenhoek rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points more than in Apeldoorn. More adults meet the physical activity guideline (56% against 50%), but fewer feel lonely (41% against 45%), fewer report anxiety or depression (44% against 46%) and fewer smoke (16% against 17%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Matenhoek, covering 81% of the area, against 12% in Apeldoorn. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 5% of the area, 58 percentage points below the 63% in Apeldoorn.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲2 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▼58 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (63%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
56%
▲6 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (50%)
Lonely
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (45%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
▼2 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (46%)
Excessive drinking
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Apeldoorn (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
81%
▲69 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (12%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼59 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (59%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (22%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲2 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▼58 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (63%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
56%
▲6 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (50%)
Lonely
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (45%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
▼2 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (46%)
Excessive drinking
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Apeldoorn (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
81%
▲69 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (12%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼59 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (59%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (22%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Apeldoorn (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Apeldoorn
Good self-rated health
76.5%
73.5%
Smokes
16.5%
16.7%
Excessive drinking
7%
5.5%
Overweight
52%
52.8%
Lonely
40.9%
44.9%
Anxiety or depression feelings
43.7%
46.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
56%
50.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
5% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 63% in the municipality of Apeldoorn.
Traffic9.5%
Built-up81%
Recreation4.8%
Water4.8%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,100 m
–
GP practice
1,100 m
–
Primary school
1,200 m
–
Daycare
200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.5
GP practices
–
0.2
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Apeldoorn.
Matenhoek has 135 inhabitants (2026), or 647 per km² (30% higher than in Apeldoorn). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Apeldoorn was 79%, 1 percentage point above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-7%
▼lower than Apeldoorn (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Apeldoorn
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Apeldoorn (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲8 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (27%)
Never married
48%
▲1 percentage point higher than Apeldoorn (47%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (78%)
D66, share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-7%
▼lower than Apeldoorn (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Apeldoorn
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Apeldoorn (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲8 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (27%)
Never married
48%
▲1 percentage point higher than Apeldoorn (47%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (78%)
D66, share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 7% between 2021 and 2026, to 135.
Residents, 2026
135
-7% since 2021
Apeldoorn +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 647 residents per km², this buurt is 30% more densely populated than the municipality of Apeldoorn.
Residents per km²647
Dwellings per km²235
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 37.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
35% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2510
25 to 4530
45 to 6545
65 to 8025
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are never married.
Never married65
Married60
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
84% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands105
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Apeldoorn; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 79% of eligible voters in Apeldoorn voted. The largest party was D66 with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of ApeldoornThe Netherlands
D66
17.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15%
16.7%
VVD
14.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.6%
12.8%
CDA
12.6%
11.8%
JA21
6%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.7%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
15.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Matenhoek has an average of 2.4 cars per household, 2.0 times as high as in Apeldoorn (1.2). 41% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 17 percentage points more than in Apeldoorn (24%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
8%
▼18 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (26%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
33%
▲15 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (18%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
21%
▲11 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
2.4
▲2.0 times as high as Apeldoorn (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
41%
▲17 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+11 pp
▲higher than Apeldoorn (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
44%
▼43 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
31%
▲29 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (2%)
Retail, share of addresses
25%
▲23 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (2%)
Private rent
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business services, share of businesses
8%
▼18 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (26%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
33%
▲15 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (18%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
21%
▲11 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
2.4
▲2.0 times as high as Apeldoorn (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
41%
▲17 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+11 pp
▲higher than Apeldoorn (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
44%
▼43 percentage points lower than Apeldoorn (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
31%
▲29 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (2%)
Retail, share of addresses
25%
▲23 percentage points higher than Apeldoorn (2%)
Private rent
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 40 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie15
Handel en horeca40
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg20
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
41% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Apeldoorn (2025).
Petrol58.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)41.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 30% to 41% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
41%▲ 17 percentage points above Apeldoorn (24%)
+11 pp since 2021
Apeldoorn +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 145 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars145
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
44% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (31%).
Residential44.4%
Retail25%
Office13%
Healthcare1.9%
Industrial30.6%
Other1.9%
Explanation
Based on 108 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
15% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings15%
NL 37%▼ −59% vs NL
Private rent21%
NL 14%▲ +50% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings79%
NL 57%▲ +39% vs NL
Single-family dwellings85%
NL 63%▲ +35% vs NL
Residents per km²647
NL 539▲ +20% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025